Solar-powered space flight
3b. Power required to reach earth orbit
ignoring atmospheric drag: Assuming that we launch vertically upwards, but with
variable exhaust velocity
[this page | pdf | references | back links]
Return to Abstract
and Contents
Next page
 
3.7          However, the
required power per unit final mass falls considerably if  can
vary, as does the maximum acceleration. The optimal choice of
 can
vary, as does the maximum acceleration. The optimal choice of  with
this sort of trajectory is to maximise
 with
this sort of trajectory is to maximise  which occurs when
  which occurs when  . Flight metrics for
various ratios of
. Flight metrics for
various ratios of  using this approach
are set out in Table 2.  The acceleration   experienced by the vehicle is
constant throughout the flight (and equal to
 using this approach
are set out in Table 2.  The acceleration   experienced by the vehicle is
constant throughout the flight (and equal to  ),
see Figure 2.
),
see Figure 2.
 
Table 2. Flight characteristics to reach  for a
range of
 for a
range of  , if propellant is
ejected vertically downwards at optimally varying speeds
, if propellant is
ejected vertically downwards at optimally varying speeds
 
 
  |  (kW/kg)
 | Ratio of propellant
  to lifted mass |  (kW
  per kg lifted mass)
 | Flight time to
  reach orbital velocity (s) | Maximum
  acceleration ms-2 | 
 
  | 100 | 1.6 | 256 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 50 | 3.1 | 206 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 30 | 5.2 | 186 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 15 | 10.4 | 171 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 10 | 15.7 | 167 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 8 | 19.6 | 165 | 780 | 10 | 
 
  | 6 | 26.1 | 163 | 780 | 10 | 
 
Figure 2. Plot of
vehicle velocity as a function of time, if propellant ejected at a constant
speed vertically downwards, if  = 30 kW/kg
 = 30 kW/kg
 
 
 
 
NAVIGATION LINKS
Contents | Prev | Next